Superbe...vraiment superbe
Je trouve Bella très reussie et pleine de sensualité

Oui je le troouve aussi très bien réussi. cette sensualité, cette rage, cette soif ..... Beaucoup de talent

C'est fou ce qu'un dessin bien fait peut faire passer comme emotions,sensations etc....

Melissa Rosenberg: Breaking Dawn, Ratings, and More

Film has an inter­view with Melissa Rosen­berg where she dis­cusses writ­ing each of the Twi­light movies, Dex­ter, and writ­ing to meet a rat­ing.

“LL: If an adap­ta­tion felt to you like an R rat­ing, but the stu­dio wanted you to bring it in at a PG-13, would that be doable?

MR: Oh yeah. It’s com­pletely doable. You don’t sac­ri­fice story by cut­ting lan­guage. Nor do you sac­ri­fice story by show­ing less blood or gore, or what­ever it is that’s bring­ing you to an R rat­ing. It doesn’t hurt it. When Dex­ter was aired on CBS they had to re-cut some of it for net­work tele­vi­sion and all they had to do was cut some lan­guage. There’s more blood and gore in an episode of C.S.I., though of course Dex­ter is more dis­turb­ing. Not because of what you see, but because of what’s implied. I don’t think you take away from sus­pense or char­ac­ter by alter­ing a few things like that.

LL: Hav­ing read Break­ing Dawn, where things get ratch­eted up a notch, do you still go for that PG-13 rat­ing?

MR: Oh yeah, absolutely. That’s your audi­ence. In this series you don’t sac­ri­fice any­thing. There are some movies that wouldn’t play at PG-13, like The Hang­over, but this is just not one of them for me. Again, if you’re cap­tur­ing char­ac­ter, emo­tion, and emo­tional jour­ney, you’re OK.”

One thing that is not cov­ered in the arti­cle is an issue that for what­ever rea­son repet­i­tively comes up. Break­ing Dawn will not go to screen with a rated R rat­ing because con­trac­tu­ally it can’t. It would have to be recut to get a PG-13. Part of the deal for Sum­mit to have the rights to the film is no more than a PG-13. You can still have blood and guts (ER’s final sea­son any­one), and steamy romance (Remem­ber Me and the Note­book) with­out broach­ing the R-rating.

source Twi­light Lex­i­con (Via RPattzNews)

Melissa Rosenberg: Breaking Dawn, le PG 13 , et bien plus

Film a fait une interview avec Melissa Rosen­berg où elle parle des scènarios de Twilight , Dex­ter, et d'écrire tout en respectant le PG 13

“LL: SI une adaptation est R rated mais que le stu­dio veut que vous fassiez un script PG-13, est ce faisable?

MR: Oh oui . Tout à fait faisable . Vous ne sacrifiez pas l'histoire en coupant des extraits . Ni en montrant moins de sang ou de gore , ou tout ce qui vous amène à une classification R rat­ed. Ca ne fait rien . Quand Dex­ter a été diffusé sur CBS ils ont dû faire des coupures pour la télé­vi­sion et ce qu'ils ont coupé c'était au niveau du langage Il y a plus de sang et du gore dans un épisode des Experts même si bien sûr Dex­ter est plus perturbant. Pas à cause de ce qu'on voit , mais par rapport à ce qui est sous entendu . Je ne pense pas qu'on enlève du sus­pense ou qu'on amoindrisse les personnages à cause de ça

LL: Ayant lu Break­ing Dawn, où les choses montent d'un cran , le film sera t il encore PG-13 ?

MR: Oh oui , absolument . C'est notre public . Dans cette saga , on ne sacrifie rien . Certains films ne joueraient pas le jeu du PG-13, comme dans The Hang­over, mais pour moi ce n'est pas un souci . Si vous capturez les personnages ; l'émotion ou le voyage émotionnel , tout va bien.”

. Break­ing Dawn ne sera donc pas classé R Rated à cause du contrat Il faudra qu'il convienne au PG-13. Une partie du contrat pour Sum­mit qui a acquis les droits c'est le respect du PG-13. On peut toujours avoir du sang et du gore (souvenez vous la dernière saison d'Urgences ), et des histoires d'amour sensuelles (Remem­ber Me et The Note­book) sans pour autant avoir le R Rated

source Twi­light Lex­i­con (Via RPattzNews)

Si vraiment c'est au niveau du langage, ça va. On aura nos scènes d'amour et puis The notebook , on voit de belles scènes d'amours. J'espère que ce sera dans cette lignée...

et leur PG13

heureusement que l'on pourra se rattraper avec "bel ami", enfin j'espère
Mais peut être qu'il feront comme pour le DVD de the notebook, car il est gavé de scènes coupées et rallongées très très sensuelles

Les 5 scènes qu'on veut retrouver dans Breaking Dawn:
With the recent announcements that director Bill Condon will be at the helm of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn and that the movie won’t release until November 2011, we got to thinking about which scenes need to make the transition from book to movie.

It’s no secret that the fourth installment in The Twilight Saga received a mixed reaction when published, or that the movie is one of the most hotly debated topics among fans. Here are 5 scenes we think deserve a place in the movie. Do you agree or disagree? Let us know in the comments.

(Warning: Contains Breaking Dawn spoilers!)

Edward & Bella’s Wedding
Their long-awaited nuptials happen quite early on in the book, much to the delight of fans of the will-they-or-won’t-they couple. It’s a family affair that almost runs smoothly, no thanks to Jacob almost wolfing out when he learns that Bella plans to become a vampire. It’s a testosterone-fueled scene, with the boys once again facing off, much to Bella’s dismay (we bet she’s secretly happy, really — who wouldn’t want Robert Pattinson and Taylor Lautner fighting over her?!). The wedding, itself, has its moments, with the high point being the vows and Edward removing Bella’s borrowed garter with his teeth. If that doesn’t make it into the movie, Melissa Rosenberg will have a lot to answer for.

The Isle Esme Honeymoon
Calm down, ladies — we’re almost positive this whole chapter will make it into the movie. It’s the perfect opportunity to feature a topless Robert Pattinson during his impromptu celebratory skinny-dip, and it’s also the first time Edward and Bella have sex. That said, it’s not nice sex — it’s Edward at his headboard-breaking, pillow-biting best, with Bella getting a little bruising during this most monumental of moments (not to mention extremely pregnant), which might not make it into the final cut of a PG-13 movie. We’re just sayin’.

Jacob Forming His Own Wolf Pack
Jacob is totally fuming throughout Breaking Dawn, which is understandable, really, seeing as Edward has stolen his one true love and future mother of his pups. He narrates the second part of the book, and gives us an awesome insight into his mind. He’s a funny guy, that Jacob Black. Unfortunately, The Pack are planning to kill Bella and her freaky fast-growing unborn child, and Jake doesn’t like that AT ALL. He’s still madly in love with her, you see, so he decides to break off from the pack and form his own, with Seth and Leah Clearwater for company. This scene could be the turning point for movie Jacob — it’d gain him some new admirers, and give Taylor Lautner a chance to shine. If it doesn’t make it to the big screen, Taycob fans will probably start writing their hate mail straight away. Are you prepared for that, Summit?

Renesmee’s Birth
This scene is where The Twilight Saga take a turn for the gruesome. It’s like something out of Alien, only not quite as surprising. Bella’s baby, Renesmee (yeah, don’t ask), is now so huge, she literally breaks out of Bella’s body, almost taking mommy’s spinal cord with her in the process. Bella’s nearly dead as a doornail before Edward realizes what he has to do to keep her alive — change her into a vampire. Like, now. So he injects his venom straight into her heart, then bites her. Many times. All over her body. It might sound hot, but it really isn’t — it’s all done in despair and with a savagery we haven’t seen from Mr. Cullen before. It’s the only scene that will push the PG-13 boundaries, but it’s one that has to be included. The imagery will be awesome.

The Introduction of Other Vampire Clans
Towards the end of the book, the Cullens are preparing to take down the Volturi, yet again, and enlist the help of several vampire covens from all around the world. It looks like it’s going to lead up to a huge battle, with casualties and bloodspill, but it doesn’t. There is one good thing to come out of an otherwise redundant section, and that’s a horde of new vampire characters. We meet the Amazon, Denali, and Irish covens, as well as the American Nomads. Some awesome characters are introduced, most notably Zafrina, Kate, and Garrett. Admittedly, they’re underutilized in the book, but a well-written script could allow them to take center stage and liven things up a bit. Believe us, it’s going to need it.
Source:Spunk-Ransom

Les 5 scènes qui devront être absolumlent dans Breaking Dawn

1) le mariage
2) la lune de miel
3) Jacob et sa meute
4) la naissance de renesmée
5) la présentation des autres vampires

Salary dispute holding up ‘Twilight 5′ announcement

EXCLUSIVE: Summit Entertainment is working furiously to close the talent deals required to split Stephenie Meyer’s fourth “Twilight” novel into two films. But an unlikely roadblock is holding up an announcement — and could even lead to cast changes for the series’ final installment.

The studio is close to finalizing agreements with leads Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson and Taylor Lautner, all of whom will get big raises to return for a fifth installment of the vampire romance saga. And director Bill Condon is already signed to film two “Breaking Dawn” movies, which would be shot back-to-back starting in the fall and released in November 2011 and summer 2012, respectively.

But Summit is having a harder time locking in some of the franchise’s secondary characters. Deals for Peter Facinelli (who plays Carlisle Cullen) and Billy Burke (Bella’s father, Charlie Swan) are done, but we’re told the actors who play the Cullen kids (especially Kellan Lutz and Ashley Greene) are trying to sink their teeth into bigger paydays that, at least at this point, the studio behind the billion-dollar franchise is unwilling to provide. “We may have a situation where one of them is thrown out on the street to make a point,” says a source close to the dealmaking.

So are we headed for a recasting on the final “Twilight”?

There is precedent for such a tactic. After the success of the first film, Summit axed Rachelle Lefevre, who played Victoria, in part because her reps played hardball on money. (Bryce Dallas Howard got the job instead.) Now, two films into the series, even the minor Twilighters (Lutz in particular) have become sought-after stars, so it makes sense they’d want to be paid more for the final film. But we’re told that the offers from Summit — which are said to be at least 10 times what the actors made on the first movie — were deemed “offensive” given the mega-money the franchise has generated.

Summit declined to comment on the situation. But the studio wants to move quickly to pull the trigger on two movies — and it isn’t afraid to recast if deals can’t be reached. Plus, it has even more reason to be concerned about costs this time around. As is typical with blockbuster franchises, the “Twilight” movies are becoming more expensive with each installment. And the leads are going to do especially well if “Breaking Dawn” is split into two parts. The trio were initially signed for three films (remember, this was back when “Twilight” was a low-budget adaptation of a niche YA novel), but in the spring of 2009 — after the first movie became an international hit — they renegotiated all their deals so Summit could lock them for a fourth movie.

The studio then realized that “Breaking Dawn,” with its 900-plus pages and narratives told from two perspectives, was dense enough to be split into two installments (as Warner Bros. announced it would do for the final “Harry Potter” book). Just one problem: The cast wasn’t signed for a fifth movie. They’re all huge stars now, with Lautner in particular running up his quote to the $7.5 million range, so another renegotiation commenced.

That meant ponying up big-time for the leads, which will make the final movie far more expensive than the others (“Eclipse,” which hits theaters June 30, is costing around $65 million, a figure sure to be dwarfed by the fourth and fifth, even if costs can be amortized by shooting them at the same time). For that reason, Summit is still holding out the option of simply doing one “Breaking Dawn,” although multiple sources say they’d be shocked if the fifth film doesn’t happen. “This thing is gonna be two movies,” one source says. “With or without the cast intact.” Meyer has already signed off on the plan to make two, a key hurdle, given the approval rights she has in her deal.

Summit also is eyeing other cost-cutting measures for the final installments. A deal is currently being negotiated to move the production to Louisiana after making the first in Portland and the second two in Vancouver and Italy. Luring “Twilight” would be a huge “get” for the state — and, given the tax credits, a money-saver for the studio.

“Twilight” has thus far been the rare tentpole franchise made on a non-tentpole budget. It’ll be interesting to see the lengths that will Summit go to keep it there. Booting an actor from the final installment of a successful series could be a risky move, though we’re betting that as long as their precious Bella, Edward and Jacob return, fans would get over any disappointment.

source the hollywood reporter via spunk ransom

Dans cet article , on nous annonce donc que Summit et stephenie sont partant pour 2 films qui sortiraient en nov 2011 et à l'été 2012. Le trio est en pourparlers et sur le point de signer mais un souci se pose: les personnages secondaires ( comme Lutz et Greene) vaudraient être mieux payés. Les accords sont déjà trouvés pour Peter Facinelli et Billy Burke . Le studio envisagerait en cas de non accord de les remplacer comme ce fut le cas pour Rachelle Lefevbre.

Ouais , je doute de la véracité de ces propos

Ben finalement , ce n'est pas de l'intox mais bien de l'info

EW rapporte que Kellan et Ashley voudraient 4 millions de dollars chacun pour chacun des 2 derniers films. Au départ, ils voulaient faire front commun avec Nikki et Jackson, mais NIkki aurait faire marche arrière et est proche de signer un accord pour 750 0000 $ à 1 M$ par film, soit le montant que Summit a initalement offert à chacun des 4 acteurs. Le statut de Jackson est encore incertain.

Ashley et Kellan arguent qu'ils font autant de promo que les acteurs principaux et qu'ils sont presque autant d'heures sur le tournage qu'eux, donc ils devraient être payés en conséquence. Une autre source impliquée dans les négociations dit qu'ils veulent juste 1 M$ ou plus.

EW prédit que vu ce qui s'est passé avec Rachelle Lefevre, Summit pourrait choisir de remplacer l'un des 2 acteurs et que les fans seraient plus outrés qu'Ashley soit viré que Kellan.


source le monde de francesca

Il faudrai qu'ils arrêtent un peu les 2 amis là. Je veux bien qu'ils renégocient leur contrat. C'est normal mais allez dire qu'ils tournent autant que les acteurs principaux . Mais bien sûr. Ils vont aux conventions car ils le veulent bien.

S'ils se font virer , on va avoir un nouveau drame Twilight....

qu'ils demandent plus je suis d'accord mais là faudrait pas exagerer!!
pfff argent quand tu nous tiens!!

C'est un peu hypocrite tout ça
Se plaindre qu'ils vont beaucoup aux conventions c'est limite parceque vu la publicité que ça leur fait c'est tout benef Surtout qu'Ashley Green est bien mimi mais bon à part Twilight et la couv' des magazines en ce moment elle n'a pas forcement de grands rôles en preparation...donc...
Et puis surtout ils sont pas avares eux quand ils demandent une augmentation de salaire 4 Millions rien que ça